RUNNING v. WIDDES

No. 151.

52 Wis.2d 254 (1971)

190 N.W.2d 169

RUNNING, Executrix of the estate of Orrin Running, substituted as plaintiff for the Bank of Cameron, Respondent, v. WIDDES and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 5, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Sheridan, Sheridan & Mellick of Waukon, Iowa, and by Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Schnurrer & Skemp of La Crosse, and oral argument by James U. Mellick of Waukon, Iowa, and Roger L. Imes of La Crosse.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Edward J. Coe of Rice Lake.


HALLOWS, C. J.

Widdes' first argument contends Running is not a proper party or a creditor under sec. 242.01 (3), Stats.,1 because when he purchased the judgment from the bank the judgment was extinguished. We think not. There was no extinguishment of the judgment debt because Running as guarantor purchased the judgment against his codefendant Widdes, the principal maker. A guarantor is entitled to recovery against the principal and he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases