The respondent was admitted to practice on April 6, 1955 in the Second Judicial Department. He is charged with professional misconduct in six specifications. The Justice of the Supreme Court appointed to take testimony reports that three of the six specifications have been sustained (A, B and F). The petitioner now moves to modify the report insofar as it found specification "C" not to have been sustained...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.