1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 6 Cal.3d
  5. 6 Cal.3d 195 (1971)
 

BUDD v. NIXEN

Docket No. L.A. 29870.

6 Cal.3d 195 (1971)

491 P.2d 433

98 Cal. Rptr. 849

WILLIAM A. BUDD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALAN NIXEN, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 2, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hunt, Liljestrom & Wentworth and Vernon W. Hunt, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Groff, Dunne, Shallcross & Kane and Russell E. Shallcross for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

This case is a companion to Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand, ante, page 176 [98 Cal.Rptr. 837, 491 P.2d 421], also decided today. In Neel we conclude that the statute of limitations for legal malpractice, as for all professional malpractice, commences to run when the client discovers, or should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases