PER CURIAM:
Appellant was convicted of bank robbery by a jury in the district court. In this appeal he asserts that the evidence was insufficient to submit the issue to the jury, and that the verdict of the jury was contrary to all the evidence.
An examination of the briefs of the parties and the record shows that although it was circumstantial, there was "clearly sufficient evidence from which a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
