1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 52 Wis.2d
  5. 52 Wis.2d 122 (1971)
 

DAY v. STATE

No. State 85.

52 Wis.2d 122 (1971)

187 N.W.2d 790

DAY, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 25, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Francis R. Bannen of Wisconsin Dells.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by William F. Eich, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

HALLOWS, C. J.

Day admits he has no right to reversal but asks that a new trial be granted in the interest of justice because his conviction was based on evidence obtained under allegedly invalid search warrants. He made no timely motion to suppress this evidence and did not object to its admissibility at the trial. In his second reason for reversal he argues the complaint, upon which he was arrested, was not grounded upon probable cause. This challenge to the sufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases