LUEDTKE v. SHEDIVY

No. 250.

51 Wis.2d 110 (1971)

186 N.W.2d 220

LUEDTKE, Appellant, v. SHEDIVY and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 4, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Kelley, Weber & Bolte and Richard J. Weber, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard J. Weber.

For the respondents there was a brief by Genrich, Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler & Conway, attorneys, and Roger Rouse and W. Thomas Terwilliger of counsel, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Mr. Rouse and Mr. W. Thomas Terwilliger.


HANLEY, J.

The following issues are presented on this appeal: (1) Were the results of the blood test properly admitted; (2) was the emergency instruction proper; (3) was the stopping, parking and leaving a vehicle on a highway instruction proper; and (4) was the award of damages so grossly inadequate as to be the result of passion, prejudice and perversity?

Admissibility of blood test.

The appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases