ROTHFUSS v. HAMILTON MASONIC TEMPLE CO.

Nos. 70-478 and 70-479.

27 Ohio St. 2d 131 (1971)

ROTHFUSS, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON MASONIC TEMPLE CO. OF HAMILTON, APPELLEE. (Two cases.)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 7, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Irving I. Saul, Messrs. Lord & Lordeon and Mr. T. Patrick Lordeon, for appellant.

Messrs. Baden, Jones & Scheper, and Mr. Thomas W. Baden, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

In the Court of Appeals, the defendant enumerated the following assignments of error:

"The court erred in admitting evidence of the plaintiff over the objection of the defendant.

"The court erred in its general charge to the jury.

"The verdict appears to be excessive and rendered under the influence of passion and prejudice.

"The verdict is excessive and is manifestly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases