The dispositive question in this proceeding for writ of prohibition is whether the enactment of section 351 of the Evidence Code, declaring generally that "Except as otherwise provided by statute, all relevant evidence is admissible," operated as a legislative repeal of the "vicarious exclusionary rule" adopted by this court in People v. Martin (1955)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KAPLAN v. SUPERIOR COURT
6 Cal.3d 150 (1971)
491 P.2d 1
98 Cal. Rptr. 649
CLIFFORD ELLIS KAPLAN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 1, 1971.
December 1, 1971.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frank L. Williams, Jr., Public Defender, John J. Resnick, James R. Goff and David W. Duncan, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.
Paul N. Halvonik, Charles C. Marson, A.L. Wirin, Fred Okrand, Lawrence R. Sperber, Karlton & Blease, Coleman A. Blease, Sheldon Portman,
Cecil Hicks, District Attorney, Michael R. Capizzi, Assistant District Attorney, and Oretta D. Sears, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent and for Real Party in Interest.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.