1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 440 F.2d
  5. 440 F.2d 1096 (1971)
 

SACRAMENTO COCA-COLA BOT. CO. v. CHAUFFEURS, ETC., LOC. 150

No. 23569.

440 F.2d 1096 (1971)

SACRAMENTO COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. Inc. and Fortuna Beverage Co. Inc., dba C-C Concession Co., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND HELPERS LOCAL NO. 150, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 26, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morton B. Jackson, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), of Hodge, Jackson, Kumler & Croskey, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert Le Prohn, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), of Le Prohn & Le Prohn, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges and CONTI, District Judge.

CONTI, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action are the Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Co., a bottler and seller of soft drinks, and Fortuna Beverage Co. Inc. ("C-C"), a concessionaire and vendor of soft drinks. The principal defendants are the local, national and international organizations of the Teamsters Union.

The allegations are basically that due to threats, duress and other coercive measures exercised by the defendants upon the California State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases