1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 52 Wis.2d
  5. 52 Wis.2d 101 (1971)
 

STATE v. TORPY

No. State 172.

52 Wis.2d 101 (1971)

187 N.W.2d 858

STATE, Respondent, v. TORPY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 25, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the briefs of Shimek & Lenchek and Jerome J. Shimek and Stan L. Lenchek, all of Milwaukee, and for the respondent on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, William A. Platz and Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorneys general, and E. Michael McCann, district attorney of Milwaukee county.

BEILFUSS, J.

The issues as we see them are:

1. Did the trial court err in finding the defendant had committed a sex crime upon hearsay testimony?

2. Was the recommendation of the H&SS Department for specialized treatment void because:

(a) The H&SS Department did not certify it had adequate facilities for examining the defendant?

(b) The examination given to the defendant did not include a physical examination.

3. Are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases