CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.
We consider three issues to be raised on this appeal:
1. Did the trial court err in refusing to permit the introduction of testimony concerning the defendant's history of epilepsy, to negate intent, in the first portion of the sequential trial?
2. Did the defendant prove he was insane at the time of the offense?
3. Is the defendant entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice?
Intent.
During...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.