LARUS & BROTHER COMPANY v. F. C. C.

No. 15382.

447 F.2d 876 (1971)

LARUS & BROTHER COMPANY, Inc., t/a the House of Edgeworth, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, The Tobacco Institute, Incorporated, et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided August 20, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abe Krash, Washington, D. C. (Daniel A. Rezneck, Jerome I. Chapman, Stephen M. Sacks, and Arnold & Porter, Washington, D. C., Lewis F. Powell, Jr., John W. Riely, and Hunton, Williams, Gay, Powell & Gibson, and Fielding L. Williams, Jr., and Williams, Mullen & Christian, Richmond, Va., on the brief), for petitioners and intervenors.

John H. Conlin, Associate Gen. Counsel (Richard E. Wiley, Gen. Counsel, and Stuart F. Feldstein, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Richard W. McLaren, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gregory B. Hovendon, Atty., Department of Justice, on the brief), for respondents.

Frank A. Fritz, Thomas C. Platt, Craig D. Walley and Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, on the brief for amicus curiae, National Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease Ass'n.

Granville Whittlesey, Jr., Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief for amicus curiae, American Cancer Society, Inc.

Before WINTER, BUTZNER, and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.


BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

The Tobacco Institute and a number of cigarette manufacturers petitioned to review a report and order of the Federal Communications Commission.1 We affirm the Commission's ruling that licensees who broadcast announcements discouraging cigarette smoking as a health hazard are not required by the fairness doctrine to grant time for the presentation of opposing views.

In anticipation of the forthcoming statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases