1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 339 F.Supp.
  5. 339 F.Supp. 973 (1971)
 

SCHWINN BICYCLE CO. v. MURRAY OHIO MANUFACTURING CO.

Civ. A. No. 5964.

339 F.Supp. 973 (1971)

SCHWINN BICYCLE COMPANY, a corporation v. MURRAY OHIO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a corporation.

United States District Court, M. D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.

October 29, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maclin P. Davis, Jr., Robert C. Hendon, Jr., Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, Nashville, Tenn., Malcolm McCaleb, William E. Lucas, Horton, Davis, McCaleb & Lucas, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

W. W. Berry, Bass, Berry & Sims, Nashville, Tenn., Kevin E. Joyce, Edward M. Prince, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MORTON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Schwinn Bicycle Company, an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois, sues the defendant, Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company, an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Nashville, Tennessee, alleging the infringement of a United States trademark, No. 570,518, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases