Appellant, successful bidder to construct a dam for the State, entered into negotiations with respondent concerning the subcontracting of certain concrete work required by the general contract. Respondent allegedly completed the work specified and on January 31, 1968 filed a notice of lien on the moneys due appellant on the general contract. In the proceedings to foreclose the lien, while the parties agreed that respondent was to be compensated on the basis of a per hour...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
