The petitioners contended at Special Term that their petition did not raise any issues as to substantial evidence and they reiterate that argument in this court and rely upon the assertion that there was not "a scintilla of evidence to support the Authority's charge." This article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination of the State Liquor Authority should have been transferred by Special Term to this court for the initial review of the Authority's determination. ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
