The trial court, absent any supporting medical testimony, concluded that the decedent, a non-ambulatory patient, was the victim of an "unusual vicious assault" and that the State was responsible for this due to a failure of proper custody and supervision. We can find no basis in the instant record to support the trial court's determination of liability on the part of the State. The State is responsible "only for hazards reasonably to be foreseen, only for risks reasonably...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.