1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 470 P.2d
  5. 470 P.2d 386 (1970)
 

BEAGLE v. RUDIE WILHELM WAREHOUSE COMPANY

470 P.2d 386 (1970)

In the matter of the Compensation of John H. BEAGLE, Claimant. John H. Beagle, Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. RUDIE WILHELM WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Inc., Dba Wilhelm Trucking Company, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

June 11, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant on rehearing. With him on the petition for rehearing were Richard Noble, and Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Portland.

Walter H. Sweek, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent on rehearing.

LANGTRY, Judge.

This case was reargued after a petition for rehearing was granted. The rehearing was granted principally because our decision did not consider the rule in Ryf v. Hoffman Construction Co., 89 Or. Adv.Sh. 483, 459 P.2d 991 (1969), which held that loss of earnings caused by the accident are a consideration in determining compensation.

On this review, we do not disturb our holding in the original opinion concerning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases