1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 35 A.D.2d
  5. 35 A.D.2d 754 (1970)
 

PAC. LIME INC. v. LOWENBERG CORP.

35 A.D.2d 754 (1970)

Pacific Lime Incorporated, Respondent, v. Lowenberg Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants State Bank of Albany, Respondent, v. Lowenberg Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants State Bank of Albany, Respondent, v. Chazy Lake Development Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

October 26, 1970

The defendants Lowenberg Corporation and Chazy Lake Development Corporation have not clearly and adequately complied with paragraphs 4th and 5th of plaintiff's demand for a bill of particulars. In reply to paragraph 4th, defendants have failed to specify on what dates the assurances concerning the maps were given. They have not stated specifically who was present on the occasions. This they must know, and should, therefore, so state in the bill of particulars. They should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases