We do not find a violation of any constitutional rights of plaintiff in Action No. 2. He was not denied a permit to operate a vehicle but was allowed a permit only for necessary use of his vehicle. The record discloses that there were other adequate alternative methods of reaching various localities in the geographic areas involved. The restrictions were reasonable and not an undue hardship on this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.