MATTER OF DINETZ v. JEWELERS


34 A.D.2d 720 (1970)

In the Matter of the Claim of Arthur Dinetz, Respondent, v. Brand Jewelers et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

April 23, 1970


REYNOLDS, J.

The findings of accident and casual relationship are clearly supported by substantial evidence and must therefore be affirmed. Present only are questions of credibility and a conflict of medical testimony which are solely for the board's resolution (e.g., Matter of Sugnet v. Hanna Furnace Corp., 33 A.D.2d 1064; Matter of Bombala v. Lark Mfg. Co., 32 A.D.2d 593<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases