Judgment affirmed, without costs.
The evidence adduced at the hearing before the Board of Appeals demonstrates conclusively (1) that the subject lot on which petitioner wishes to build a one-family residence has been held in single and separate ownership since prior to the enactment of the zoning ordinance and (2) that there is no feasible use for the lot other than the construction of a home thereon. This being so, the board's insistence on frontage requirements...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
