MATLOCK v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 1930.

309 F.Supp. 398 (1970)

Harold T. MATLOCK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

United States District Court, W. D. Tennessee, E. D.

February 24, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold T. Matlock, pro se.

Thomas F. Turley, U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for respondent.


OPINION

ROBERT M. McRAE, Jr., District Judge.

Petitioner, pro se, pursuant to 28 U. S.C.A. § 2255, alleges that his convictions and sentences under the Federal Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (b) and (d), are null and void. He moves that the judgments and sentences be vacated and a new trial be ordered. Petitioner contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by instructing the jury that it could find petitioner guilty of all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases