Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiffs' motion for a general preference granted.
In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny plaintiffs' application for a general preference. Neither a conflict between medical experts concerning the proximate cause of the plaintiff wife's diplopia nor a weighing of the evidence concerning that issue is relevant to whether a general preference should be granted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
