1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 257 Md.
  5. 257 Md. 435 (1970)
 

FOREMAN v. MELROD

[No. 296, September Term, 1969.]

257 Md. 435 (1970)

263 A.2d 559

FOREMAN, ET UX. v. MELROD, TO THE USE OF KRICK OF MARYLAND, INC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 1, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Smith, with whom were Karl G. Feissner and Feissner, Kaplan & Smith on the brief, for appellants.

Warren K. Kaplan, with whom were Melrod, Redman & Gartlan and Gorman E. Getty on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

BARNES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal presents to us for decision the question of whether or not the Circuit Court for Allegany County (Naughton, J.) properly held that the parol evidence rule would make inadmissible in evidence the defense of the appellants, Earl M. Foreman and Phyllis R. Foreman, his wife, to the collection of a promissory note for $90,000, that there was a contemporaneous oral agreement...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases