MAXIE v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY

No. 70-342.

241 So.2d 447 (1970)

Ulysee MAXIE, Appellant, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Virginia Corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 2, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herb Blessing, Bradenton, for appellant.

Ralph C. Dell of Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in this negligence action appeals from a directed verdict entered in favor of Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company. We must reverse.

The record discloses ample evidence from which a jury could have found the railroad negligent. The only remaining question was whether appellant was contributorily negligent, proximately contributing to his injury. Again, the record shows favorable inferences and unresolved issues of material fact bearing on contributory negligence. As has been repeatedly held,1 the jury is the proper arbiter of such matters.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON, C.J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

FootNotes


1. See, e.g., Carter v. Parker (Fla.App. 1966), 183 So.2d 3; Quinn v. I.C. Helmly Furniture Company (Fla.App. 1962), 141 So.2d 302; Foster v. Gulfstream Press, Inc. (Fla.App. 1961), 134 So.2d 270.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases