Judgment affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs have failed to show that they or their property are especially affected by the amendment to the ordinance in question or that they are sustaining a pecuniary loss by reason thereof (Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N.Y. 325; Rice v. Van Vranken, 225 App. Div. 179, affd. 255 N.Y. 541; Rose v. City of New Rochelle,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.