1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 34 A.D.2d
  5. 34 A.D.2d 593 (1970)
 

BINGHAMTON URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. ROGERS

34 A.D.2d 593 (1970)

Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency, Appellant, v. Phillis E. Rogers et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 9, 1970

REYNOLDS, J.

There is ample evidence in the record to support the award rendered by the Commissioners, and considering the limited and strictly circumscribed power of this court to review such (e.g., Matter of Huie [Fletcher-City of New York], 2 N.Y.2d 168; City of Binghamton v. Koffman, 28 A.D.2d 1071, 1072; County of Warren v. Martin, 26 A.D...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases