Appellant contends that the prosecutor made numerous remarks in his summation which constituted prejudicial error. It is true that several of the aforesaid remarks were improper. However, with the exception of one remark, defendant made no motion for a mistrial and did not object thereto. Moreover, defendant's guilt was overwhelmingly established by the testimony of several policemen and, consequently, any errors because of the prosecutor's summation must be characterized...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.