1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 47 Wis.2d
  5. 47 Wis.2d 565 (1970)
 

RUST v. RUST

No. 272.

47 Wis.2d 565 (1970)

177 N.W.2d 888

RUST, Respondent, v. RUST, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 26, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Tilg & Koch, and oral argument by John P. Hayes, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Gaines & Saichek, attorneys, and Irving D. Gaines and David A. Saichek of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Irving D. Gaines.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The defendant-wife asserts that her motion for a money judgment for the arrearage in alimony should have been granted.

The Wisconsin law, however, is clear that one to whom alimony is due and owing is not thereby entitled to a money judgment. Sec. 247.32, Stats.,1 provides that the court has continuing jurisdiction to revise its judgments.

In a case in which a wife sought to collect an alimony arrearage by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases