In affirming, we point out, as the Judge who made the order did not, that, though there might be disagreement as to whether, reading together the requirements and definitions of sections 622 and 624 of the Family Court Act, "the allegations required by paragraphs * * * (c), and (d) of section six hundred fourteen are supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence", there can be no doubt whatever that, in the sad circumstances of this case, and, as provided by subdivision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
