On defendant's appeal from a conviction for robbery two issues have been raised requiring a new trial and a new preliminary identification hearing. The first relates to improper cross-examination of defendant by the prosecutor to elicit and then contradict on rebuttal by extrinsic proof matter excludable because obtained in violation of the rules laid down in Miranda v. Arizona (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. RAHMING
26 N.Y.2d 411 (1970)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip Rahming, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 4, 1970.
Decided May 13, 1970.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE and GIBSON concur with Judge BREITEL; Judge BERGAN dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion in which Judges SCILEPPI and JASEN concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.