AUSTIN INSTRUMENT v. LORAL CORP.


35 A.D.2d 387 (1970)

Austin Instrument, Inc., Respondent, v. Loral Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 17, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alvin A. Simon for appellant.

Herbert L. Ortner of counsel (Morris Dershowitz with him on the brief; Salon, Ortner, Yavers, Dershowitz & Raybin, attorneys), for respondent.

MARKEWICH and McNALLY, JJ., concur with EAGER, J. P.; STEUER, J., dissents in opinion in which NUNEZ, J., concurs.


EAGER, J. P.

Following a trial before Honorable THOMAS A. AURELIO, Special Referee, the plaintiff (Austin) was awarded judgment for the full amount of the balance owing under sub-contracts with defendant (Loral), including agreed upon price increases, for the manufacture and delivery of precision gear parts and assemblies used in connection with a quantity of radar dopplers which Loral had agreed to furnish for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases