1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 47 Wis.2d
  5. 47 Wis.2d 368 (1970)
 

CARR v. AMUSEMENT, INC.

No. 239.

47 Wis.2d 368 (1970)

177 N.W.2d 388

CARR, Appellant, v. AMUSEMENT, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 5, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Charne, Glassner, Tehan, Clancy & Taitelman, and oral argument by Brendan M. Comer and William E. Glassner, Jr., all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Aberg, Bell, Blake & Metzner of Madison, and oral argument by Carroll E. Metzner.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

Several issues are raised by plaintiff-appellant, the principal one dealing with the jury finding that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant.

Jury verdict.

This is a jury verdict which has the full approval of the trial court.1 It is not to be upset if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases