VINYARD v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 10023-PR.

106 Ariz. 164 (1970)

472 P.2d 33

Harmon Spier VINYARD, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Bar-D Corporation, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Rehearing Denied September 15, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Strickland, Altaffer, Davis & Eppstein, by Robert W. Eppstein, Tucson, for petitioner.

Donald L. Cross, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, by Dee-Dee Samet, Tucson, for respondent carrier, State Compensation Fund.


LOCKWOOD, Chief Justice:

This case is before us on a petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 11 Ariz.App. 551, 466 P.2d 770, setting aside an award of the Arizona Industrial Commission. The opinion of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the award of the Industrial Commission is set aside.

Harmon Vinyard, hereinafter referred to as claimant, was employed by the Bar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases