1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 430 F.2d
  5. 430 F.2d 1202 (1970)
 

HECHT v. HARRIS, UPHAM & CO.

Nos. 22971, 23017.

430 F.2d 1202 (1970)

Bertha HECHT, Plaintiff, Appellee and Appellant, v. HARRIS, UPHAM & CO., a partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a corporation, Defendants, Appellants and Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing September 4, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emanuel Becker (argued), New York City, Thomas A. H. Hartwell, of Cooley, Crowley, Gaither, Godward, Castro & Huddleson, San Francisco, Cal., E. C. Mahoney, Burlingame, Cal., for appellant.

Donald F. X. Finn (argued), New York City, Reed H. Bement, Morris Lowenthal of Lowenthal & Lowenthal, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.

POWELL,** District Judge.

The cross appeals by Harris, Upham & Co., Harris, Upham & Co. Inc. (appellants), and Mrs. Bertha Hecht (appellee) are from a judgment of the District Court awarding appellee $504,391.02. The opinion of the District Court is reported at 283 F.Supp. 417 (1968). The basic facts of the case are set forth there.

In January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases