1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 431 F.2d
  5. 431 F.2d 1145 (1970)
 

MARICOPA COUNTY v. AMERICAN PIPE AND CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 24737.

431 F.2d 1145 (1970)

MARICOPA COUNTY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN PIPE AND CONSTRUCTION CO. et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 26, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for Smith Scott & United Concrete Pipe.

Pierce T. Selwood (argued), of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, Cal., for Martin-Marietta Corp.

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for U.S. Indus.

Jesse O'Malley (argued), of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Los Angeles, Cal., for U.S. Steel.

George Jansen, Wayne Pitluck, of Sullivan, Marinos, Augustine & Delafield, San Diego, Cal., for American Pipe & Constr. and Am. Concrete.

Gordon Johnson (argued), of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, San Francisco, Cal., for Kaiser Steel Corp.

Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes, Phoenix, Ariz., for O'Malley Gannaway Concrete Pipe.

Dominic B. King, Pittsburgh, Pa., for U.S. Steel.

Ronald W. Meyer (argued), Deputy County Atty., Moise Berger, Maricopa County Atty., R. E. Johnson, of Johnson, Bebeau & Timbanard, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, Salt Lake City, Utah, Olmstead, Stine & Campbell, Ogden, Utah, amicus curiae.

Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the district court denying appellants' motion for summary judgment. We affirm on the grounds stated in the district court's opinion, except that we do not pass upon the soundness of the district court's dictum that a government antitrust proceeding filed more than one year subsequent to the termination of a prior government antitrust proceeding could not toll the running of the statute of limitations on private treble damage actions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases