MAIZELS v. VAN HOOMISSEN

No. 25562.

429 F.2d 982 (1970)

Sol D. MAIZELS, Appellee, v. George VAN HOOMISSEN, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 14, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Al J. Laue (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Jacob B. Tanzer, Sol. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellant.

Paul R. Meyer (argued) and Marvin S. Nepom (argued), of Kobin & Meyer, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Upon the authority of Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970), the order for the return of the seized films is affirmed.

Since acquiescence with our decision can, we feel, be assumed until the contrary appears, the case is remanded with instructions that the injunction against future seizures be vacated.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge (concurring):

This is more dirty pictures business. Obviously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases