1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 429 F.2d
  5. 429 F.2d 873 (1970)
 

LOCKLIN v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORPORATION

Nos. 17730, 17731.

429 F.2d 873 (1970)

Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brandt, d/b/a Radiant Color Company, Counter-Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. DAY-GLO COLOR CORPORATION (formerly Switzer Bros., Inc.), Robert C. Switzer, and Joseph L. Switzer, Counter-Defendants, Appellants, and Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 15, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Michod, Chicago, Ill., Carl Hoppe, San Francisco, Cal., for Locklin.

Samuel W. Kipnis, Chicago, Ill., Thomas V. Koykka, Arter & Hadden, Thomas J. Gray, Cleveland, Ohio, for Day-Glo Color Corp., and others.

Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, KILEY, Circuit Judge, and GRANT, District Judge.

GRANT, District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

In these cases, Day-Glo Color Corporation, et al., (hereinafter "Switzer") appeal, and Locklin and Brandt (hereinafter "Radiant") cross appeal, from the district court's judgment. We affirm.

HISTORY

The parties compete in the daylight fluorescent materials market. The two types of products involved are liquid colors (variously known as silk screen colors, wet...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases