1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 311 F.Supp.
  5. 311 F.Supp. 847 (1970)
 

SIEGEL v. CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC.

Civ. No. 46271-GBH.

311 F.Supp. 847 (1970)

Harvey SIEGEL and Elaine Siegel, husband and wife, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC., et al., Defendants, Vance E. SHEPHERD and Ben Zachary, a partnership, et al., Intervening Plaintiffs. CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC., et al., Cross-Claimants, v. Harvey SIEGEL et al., Cross-Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

Supplemental Memorandum April 10, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Broad, Busterud & Khourie, Michael N. Khourie, Royce H. Schulz, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs, intervening plaintiffs and the class.

M. Laurence Popofsky, Richard L. Goff, Stephen V. Bomse, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT

GEORGE B. HARRIS, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs' motion for a directed verdict following the close of defendants' case case and the submission of the evidence. The Court being fully advised and having considered all of the testimony and evidence, including the numerous and lengthy oral arguments of counsel, all of the briefs, depositions and affidavits, has now reached...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases