The question presented by the instant appeal is whether the trial court properly charged that the standard of care applicable to the defendant, a 17-year-old licensed driver, was only that standard of care "which a reasonably prudent boy of 17 years of age might have exercised or should have exercised".
On May 3, 1963, at approximately 4:50 P.M., an automobile operated by the defendant struck the infant plaintiff while he was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.