1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 35 A.D.2d
  5. 35 A.D.2d 67 (1970)
 

MATTER OF HENIG

35 A.D.2d 67 (1970)

In the Matter of Joseph Henig, an Attorney, Respondent, Edward Margolin, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 20, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Margolin (James J. Fitzpatrick of counsel), petitioner in person.

Bracken & Sutter (John J. Sutter and James H. Moffatt of counsel), for respondent.

CHRIST, P. J., RABIN, HOPKINS, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

The petitioner has moved to confirm in part and to disaffirm in part the report of the Justice designated to hear the charges of professional misconduct against the respondent. The respondent cross-moves to confirm the report with respect to the charges which were found therein not to have been proven and otherwise to disaffirm it.

Nine specifications of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases