CARUSO v. INC. VILL. OF SLOATSBURG


35 A.D.2d 988 (1970)

Charles Caruso, Jr., Respondent, v. Incorporated Village of Sloatsburg et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 28, 1970


Order affirmed, without costs.

We are of the view that the prior proceedings in this case gave defendants the notice required by section 341-b of the Village Law (Quintero v. Long Is. R. R., 31 A.D.2d 844). However, insofar as the Special Term assumed that we had already decided in our prior decision in this action that section 341-b had been complied with (Matter of Caruso v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases