N. L. R. B. v. SOUTH BAY DAILY BREEZE

No. 21949.

415 F.2d 360 (1969)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTH BAY DAILY BREEZE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 19, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Joseph (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Lawrence M. Joseph, J. Richard Thesing, Attys., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

O'Melveny & Myers (argued), Charles G. Bakaly, Jr., Peter M. Anderson, Stanley H. Williams, Brundage & Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before BARNES and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, Senior District Judge.


BARNES, Circuit Judge:

This case is before us pursuant to section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) (1964), which authorizes our review of orders issued by the National Labor Relations Board. The Board has petitioned for enforcement against the respondent, South Bay Daily Breeze, of an order issued on October 12, 1966, and reported (along with the Board's decision) at 160 N.L.R.B. 1850 (1966).

Respondent publishes a daily newspaper...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases