HELLBAUM v. BURWELL & MORFORD

No. 55-40397-1.

1 Wn. App. 694 (1969)

463 P.2d 225

DONALD HELLBAUM et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants, v. BURWELL AND MORFORD, Appellant and Cross-respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One, Panel 2.

December 31, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester and Earle W. Zinn, for appellant.

Reed, McLure & Moceri, Roy J. Moceri, and William R. Hickman, for respondent.


HOROWITZ, A.C.J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant corporation Burwell and Morford (Burwell), a mortgage broker and insurance agent, for damages caused by Burwell's failure to provide adequate fire insurance on plaintiffs' house. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the plaintiffs contending that the evidence is insufficient to warrant any such judgment and that alternatively defendant is entitled to a new trial.

[1] We must...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases