MENGE v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.

No. 107.

41 Wis.2d 578 (1969)

164 N.W.2d 495

MENGE, Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 7, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Everson, Whitney, O'Melia, Everson & Brehm of Green Bay, and oral argument by John C. Whitney.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bittner, Petitjean, Greenwood & Hinkfuss of Green Bay, and oral argument by Robert L. Bittner.


HANLEY, J.

The following issues are presented on this appeal:

(1) Did the trial court err in giving the emergency instruction;

(2) If there was error, was it prejudicial;

(3) Is an objection to a jury instruction properly made when it is raised initially on motions after verdict;

(4) Did the trial court err in failing to give certain jury instructions requested by the plaintiff; and

(5) Did the trial court abuse its discretion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases