33 A.D.2d 524 (1969)

In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Stone, Respondent, v. N. Y. Artificial Breeders' Co-Op, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

September 11, 1969


Appellants dispute the finding of a chest injury and, more particularly, the board's finding that "it is a logical and reasonable inference that the cow struck claimant [sic] in the chest". Contrary to appellants' contention, we find the inference completely reasonable and well grounded. The witness Ruhlen did not see the accident but saw decedent at the cow's head, attempting to read her eartag, heard a disturbance and looked and saw decedent, some six feet in front of the cow, picking himself up from the concrete floor, where, it would appear, the subsequently diagnosed back injury occurred. The inferred chest injury is further corroborated by decedent's statements to his wife and to Ruhlen; by his complaints to a physician, including that of pain in the left side of his chest; and, importantly, Dr. Bauer's analysis of the pathologist's description of a red-gray thrombus as indicating "a recent clot" and his conclusion from the pathologist's description of a red-gray thrombus superimposed upon a rupture of an atheromatous plaque that the rupture and the thrombus were "of several days duration, or corresponding back to June 14th, the day of the work accident". Indeed, the inference which the board found has some support in the testimony of appellants' consultant that the thrombus could have been from four days to two weeks old and that the condition could be traumatically induced by "a direct blow at the level of that coronary artery". The fact that much of the evidence supporting the board's decision is circumstantial makes that decision no less sound. (See People v. Wachowicz, 22 N.Y.2d 369.) The board's finding of a chest injury having been fully warranted, it follows that the medical evidence, some of which has been quoted, adequately supports the finding of causal relationship.

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases