Appellants dispute the finding of a chest injury and, more particularly, the board's finding that "it is a logical and reasonable inference that the cow struck claimant [sic] in the chest". Contrary to appellants' contention, we find the inference completely reasonable and well grounded. The witness Ruhlen did not see the accident but saw decedent at the cow's head, attempting to read her eartag, heard a disturbance and looked and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
