BLACK BALL FREIGHT SERVICE v. WN. UTIL. & TRANSP. COMM'N

No. 40264.

77 Wn.2d 479 (1969)

463 P.2d 169

BLACK BALL FREIGHT SERVICE et al., Appellants, v. WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 31, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reaugh, Hart, Allison, Prescott & Davis, George H. Hart, and Jack R. Davis, for appellants.

The Attorney General and Robert E. Simpson, Assistant, for respondent Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission.

George R. LaBissoniere, for respondents Becker et al.


HILL, J.

To give this case its proper setting we quote from City Sanitary Serv., Inc. v. Washington Util. & Transp. Comm'n, 64 Wn.2d 739, 741, 393 P.2d 952 (1964), as follows:

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission is an administrative agency, and as such is a fact-finding tribunal. Herrett Trucking Co. v. Washington Public Ser. Comm.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases