STATE v. MACINTYRE

No. State 117.

41 Wis.2d 481 (1969)

164 N.W.2d 235

STATE, Plaintiff, v. MACINTYRE, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 4, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there were briefs and oral argument by Rudolph P. Regez of Monroe, counsel for the Board of State Bar Commissioners.

For the defendant there was a brief and oral argument by John T. Harrington of Madison.


PER CURIAM.

In disciplinary proceedings brought against members of the legal profession, as in other types of actions, the similarly situated are to be treated similarly. However, each such proceeding appears to bring special factors and individual characteristics, distinguishing it, in degree if not in kind, from earlier proceedings of a generally similar nature. This is certainly true in this proceeding.

Here we deal with an attorney who was convicted, on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases