1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 105 N.J.
  5. 105 N.J. Super. 385 (1969)
 

HACKER v. STATMAN

105 N.J. Super. 385 (1969)

252 A.2d 406

MARVIN HACKER AND EVELYN HACKER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ROBERT STATMAN AND EAT MOR DISTRIBUTING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 24, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Jung, Selikoff, Rathman & Dwyer, attorneys).

Mr. H. Lee Sarokin argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Lasser, Lasser, Sarokin & Hockman, attorneys; Messrs. Sarokin, Sheppard A. Guryan and Irving C. Marcus, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

Defendants Robert Statman and Eat Mor Distributing Co. appeal from the granting of a new trial following a jury verdict in their favor, and from the entry of judgments based upon jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs Evelyn Hacker and Marvin Hacker on retrial, and the denial of their subsequent motions for a new trial.

Although the record before us is lengthy, the facts are comparatively uncomplicated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases