1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 300 F.Supp.
  5. 300 F.Supp. 84 (1969)
 

UNITED STATES v. UNIROYAL, INC.

No. 64 Civ. 1949.

300 F.Supp. 84 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. UNIROYAL, INC. (formerly known as United States Rubber Company), Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 5, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman H. Seidler, Atty., Dept. of Justice, for plaintiff; by Augustus A. Marchetti, Edward Friedman, and David V. Keegan, New York City, of counsel.

Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor & Wood, New York City, for defendant; by Walter Barthold and David N. Goldsweig, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

POLLACK, District Judge.

The complaint in this action was filed on June 24, 1964 under Section 4 of the Sherman Act to prevent and restrain defendant from alleged continuing violations of Section 1 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in interstate trade and commerce in rubber-soled canvas footwear, produced and sold by defendant under the names of "Keds" and "Kedettes".* The first paragraph of the multi-paragraph prayer for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases